New: Institutional Licensing, deploy across your district or college. Read the framework →
A aiessaydetector.ai

For institutions · Compliance

The data-handling posture your procurement team needs.

Data Processing Agreement, subprocessor list, retention controls, state-level student-data-privacy addenda, and the honest answers to the hard questions.

Request the compliance pack Privacy policy

About: Compliance

This page is the starting point for compliance review. It summarizes our posture; the full DPA, subprocessor list, and SOC 2 report are shared under NDA during procurement. Request them at /contact.

FERPA

FERPA applies to schools, not vendors, but we operate as a "school official" under the exception at 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(1). That means we access student records only at the school's direction, use them only for the stated educational purpose (AI-likelihood assessment), and are subject to the school's audit. Our school-official agreement template is the default for K-12 and higher-ed deployments.

GDPR

For European students, European study-abroad programs, and institutions with any EU nexus: Data Processing Agreement on request, subprocessor list published and updated, right-to-erasure supported within 30 days, international-transfer mechanism via EU Standard Contractual Clauses plus a Transfer Impact Assessment. Our EU-resident users are served from EU data regions where elected.

COPPA

For K-12 users under 13, SSO metadata drives a restricted mode: no persistent storage of submissions, no cross-session history, no profiling, no marketing. Parental-consent routing is handled by the school under the school-official exception to COPPA's direct-notice requirement.

State-level addenda

We sign the following as default addenda for K-12 procurement:

  • California. SOPIPA (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 22584 et seq.)
  • New York. Ed Law § 2-d, Parents' Bill of Rights, NIST 800-53-aligned security controls
  • Illinois. SOPPA (Student Online Personal Protection Act)
  • Colorado. Student Data Transparency and Security Act
  • Connecticut. Act Concerning Student Data Privacy
  • Texas. TSDPA (Student Data Privacy Consortium)

Other state addenda are signed on request; the usual review cycle is 7–14 business days.

SOC 2

SOC 2 Type II report available under NDA. Audit period is rolling; we share the most recent report during procurement. Our control environment covers access management, change management, incident response, and vendor management (subprocessor oversight).

Subprocessors

Full list published on our /subprocessors page (coming with Institutional plans) and refreshed when changes occur. Material changes trigger a 30-day advance notice to institutional customers.

Retention controls

  • Default: 30 days, then deletion.
  • Institutional option: scan-and-discard (zero retention). Submitted text is scored and deleted within the same request cycle.
  • On-prem / VPC deployment: available at the Enterprise tier for institutions with stricter data-residency requirements.

The hard questions, answered

  • "Do you train on submitted text?" No. Training data is licensed and unrelated to user submissions. We will sign a contractual prohibition on training with customer data.
  • "Do you share or sell student data?" No. No advertising, no profiling, no resale.
  • "Can the detector be biased against non-native English speakers, disabled students, or specific demographic groups?" Yes, this is a known failure mode of all AI-detection tools, not just ours. Our published false-positive rate stratifies by known risk groups. See /transparency.
  • "What's your breach-notification timeline?" 72 hours from discovery to customer notification, matching GDPR Article 33.

School-official posture

We operate under FERPA's 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(1) school-official exception, accessing records only at school direction, only for the stated educational purpose, subject to school audit.

State-addenda by default

SOPIPA (CA), Ed Law 2-d (NY), SOPPA (IL), Colorado, Connecticut, and Texas addenda signed as the default, not as negotiation. Other states reviewed in 7–14 business days.

SOC 2 Type II

Report available under NDA during procurement. Scope covers access management, change management, incident response, and vendor oversight.

Frequently asked questions

Is aiessaydetector.ai FERPA-certified?
FERPA does not certify vendors, it applies to schools. We operate as a 'school official' under 34 CFR § 99.31(a)(1), which is the standard FERPA-compatible vendor posture. Our school-official agreement is the default for K-12 and higher-ed customers.
What is your SOC 2 status?
SOC 2 Type II report available under NDA during procurement. Scope covers access management, change management, incident response, and vendor oversight.
How do you handle right-to-erasure requests?
Under GDPR, a request is honored within 30 days. For institutional customers, the right is exercised by the institution (as controller) on behalf of the student; we act as processor.
Can we deploy on our own infrastructure?
VPC and on-prem deployments are available at the Enterprise tier. Contact sales via /contact for scoping.

Request the compliance pack.

DPA, SOC 2 Type II report, and subprocessor list, under NDA.

Start a compliance review